🔐 Part of the Safeword™ Project by Lifesaver Labs Public Benefit Corporation

Five Nines Færtility⁵

v0.5.4-alpha⊕ Open-Source on GitHub

Family Planning · Demographic Projection · Birth Pacing · Time Management

▼
United States of America, Sovereign Tribes and Territories

Please visit Bedsider.org for comprehensive medical foundations and side-effect profiles for every type of birth control. Advisory: Bedsider.org uses misleading single-method "effectiveness percents per year per couple" and does not provide combined multilayer calculations. The calculations on this site use a strictly scientific "failures per 10,000 over a 12-year youthtime" multilayer model — and actively promote responsible multilayer combined birth control of three, four, five, or even six layers, tailored to each couple's anatomical assumptions, side-effect tolerances, and religious beliefs.

Methods like RISUG / Contraline Adam — a reversible polymer injection directly into the vas deferens — have demonstrated near-perfect efficacy in trials with essentially no systemic hormonal side effects. Yet they remain trapped in underfunded research pipelines, starved of the public health investment and legislative will needed to scale them.

If aggressively funded and deployed in precautionary-principle-accelerated waves, these methods could allow females to step back from decades of hormonal burden, while giving males more genuine choice and control over paternity than at any point in human history. The downstream effect — a dramatic reduction in unplanned pregnancies and the resultant rates of abortion — is both predictable and foundational.

The failure to fund male contraception is a public health and reproductive justice failure. Legislatures and health agencies should treat reversible vas-deferens injection technology with the same urgency as any other tier-1 reproductive technology.

Birth Control Method Selector

🧩
No layers selected yet.
Click any method below to start building your multilayer protection stack. Aim for 3 or more layers.
1HnHormonal
Hormonal Systemics (Max 1)
Max 1
2IdIUD
IUDs (Max 1)
Max 1
3PvPenile/Vag
Penile/Vaginal Barriers (Max 1)
Max 1
4CkCervical
Cervical Barriers (Max 1)
Max 1
5FwFertility Aware
Fertility Awareness (Max 1)
Max 1
6SbSupplemental
Supplemental Behaviors
Max 2
7EmEmerging Male
Emerging Male Methods (Max 1) ⚗
Max 1
8BsBaseline
Baseline
Max 1

Exposed Statistical Formula Panel

Fannual=f110,000×f210,000×⋯×fn10,000F_{\text{annual}} = \frac{f_1}{10{,}000} \times \frac{f_2}{10{,}000} \times \cdots \times \frac{f_n}{10{,}000}
Annual Failure Rate
8.500e-1
Fannual=850010,000F_{\text{annual}} = \frac{8500}{10{,}000}
Adjusted Risk (× Intimacy Rate)
8.500e-1
Fadj=Fannual×1.000F_{\text{adj}} = F_{\text{annual}} \times 1.000
12-Year Youthtime Failure
100.0000%
1−(1−Fadj)121 - (1 - F_{\text{adj}})^{12}
Lucky / Chance Babies per (10k×12yr)
10,000
⚠
Exceeds Safe Harbor Threshold
10,000 Lucky / Chance Babies per 10,000 couples over 12-yr Youthtime
⚡
Lightning Strike Context

With your current method selection, an unintended pregnancy is ~50,917× more likely than being struck by lightning over the same 12-year timespan — NWS puts the annual per-person strike risk at 1-in-1,222,000 (~0.2 per 10,000 couples over 12 yrs). Your current rate: 10,000 per 10,000 vs. lightning's ~0.2 per 10,000.

Legal Safe Harbor Threshold

10

Set the maximum number of legitimated terminated pregnancies / abortions / baby murders per 10,000 couples over a 12-year youthtime that your community considers acceptable evidence of diligent multilayer birth control effort — below which a couple has demonstrated genuine care and may seek a legitimated abortion locally. Slide toward zero to demand near-zero baby murder rates.

📊 12025 Baseline Under Old Single-Method "Effectiveness Per Year" Advice

Under the myopic single-method model historically promoted by mainstream health agencies — expressing contraception as a simple "X% effective per year per couple" — the USA recorded approximately 930,000 abortions per year (CDC, 2021), against ~65 million reproductive-age couples. That projects to roughly ~1,716 terminated pregnancies per 10,000 couples over a 12-year youthtime. This is the societal cost of failing to teach multilayer compounding birth control mathematics.

1 — Minimum250500 — Max harbor
Historic single-method reference: 1,716 (off-scale right →)
🧮 National Demand at This Threshold (65M US Couples)
65,000
Legitimated baby murders / yr
780,000
Total over 12-yr youthtime
93%
Reduction vs. 12025 baseline

At a threshold of 10 per 10,000 couples threshold, a society tolerating this level of diligence failure would see approximately 65,000 Legitimated baby murders / yr nationally — compared to the ~930,000/yr under the old single-method advice model.

🪦 Burial Mound Projection — Driven by Your Method Selection Above

This visualization is calculated directly from your selected birth control methods. The Safe Harbor Threshold (below) is a separate legal/policy tool that defines your jurisdiction's acceptable diligence level — it does not affect this projection, only whether your method choice meets that threshold.

✝ Burial Mound Commitment — "Yes We Kant" Pool

"Act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law." — Kant, Groundwork §421. Default view (⚖ Kantian): projects your chosen method's failure rate universally across all 65,000,000 reproductive couples — the true national outcome if everyone made this choice. Calibrated against the baseline of 930,160 terminations/yr.

📊 Baseline — Rate Calibration (USAT²)
930,160
terminations/yr baseline (USAT²)
4
median cemeteries completely filled/yr at baseline rate
0.4
cemeteries completely filled/yr at CDC rate for this method's cohort (~11.0% of US)

True total incl. unreported likely ~1.0–1.1M/yr. Each cemetery icon below represents ~242,205 burial mound interments in a median 20-acre municipal cemetery.

⚖ Kantian Universal Law Projection — All 65,000,000 Couples (USAT²)

If every US reproductive couple adopted this exact method combination, the national burial obligation would be 4,604,167 interments/yr, filling 19.0 median cemeteries completely each year. This is the Yes We Kant standard: your personal contraceptive choice, universalized.

This method universalized produces MORE national burials than the current CDC baseline.
4,604,167
Burials / yr if universalized
19.0
Cemeteries completely filled / yr
(universal law)
3.8
Baseline rate
same scale
0%
Burial reduction vs. baseline
Serpent Mound — All 65M USAT² couples (Kantian universal law) / decade

Ouroboros mound: ~150 individual burial plots spiral inward per decade as the serpent devours its own tail. 190.1 complete rotations.

⚬
Early (<9 wk)
Urn interment, stone marker
65% · 0.12 m²/plot
◦
Early-mid (9–13 wk)
Small container, mound marker
25% · 0.25 m²/plot
○
Mid (13–20 wk)
Small coffin, named mound
8% · 0.5 m²/plot
●
Late / Viable (>20 wk)
Full infant mound, ceremony
2% · 1 m²/plot
📐 Model Assumptions
  • • Couples base (USAT²): 65,000,000 reproductive-age couples
  • • Method prevalence: CDC 2021 Abortion Surveillance; CDC NSFG 2017–2019
  • • Selected method cohort: ~11.0% → 7,150,000 couples
  • • Median municipal cemetery: ~20 acres / ~80,937 m² total; 60% usable
  • • Avg footprint per mound/urn/container: ~0.20 m² (stage-weighted)
  • • Interments per cemetery: ~242,205
  • • Stage distribution: 4 stages
  • • Termination rate: 85% of unplanned pregnancies
  • • Baseline: 930,160 terminations/yr (USAT²)
Contraceptive Failure Rates: Bradley SEK, Polis CB, et al. Effectiveness, safety... Contraceptive Technology. 22nd ed. 2023.
No-Method Baseline Model:Zinaman MJ et al. "Estimates of human fertility and pregnancy loss." Fertil Steril. 1996;65(3):503–9 (fecundability ~0.20/cycle) · Chandra A et al. Fertility, Family Planning, and Reproductive Health of U.S. Women. NCHS Data Brief, 2005 · Labbok MH & Hight-Laukaran V. "Multicenter study of the Lactational Amenorrhea Method." Contraception. 1997;55(6):327–36 (postpartum infertility ~12 mo median) · Martin JA et al. "Births: Final Data for 2021." National Vital Statistics Reports. 2023;72(1) (twin rate ~3.3%).